The PsyOp Framework: How Reality Gets Weaponized

What is a PSYOP — really?

In this milestone Episode 50 of Fortean Winds, RamX and Bones break down official U.S. military doctrine on Psychological Operations (PSYOP), information warfare, and cognitive influence — then apply it to modern media, social networks, and even UFO disclosure.

From Joint Chiefs doctrine (JP 3-13.2) to digital botnets, memetic warfare, and algorithmic amplification, this episode explains how perception itself has become the battlefield.

Are UFO narratives being used as distraction, narrative management, or strategic belief shaping?
 Is modern disclosure organic — or structured?

This is not speculation. It’s a field manual.

If perception is the battlefield, then PSYOP is the weapon.

Topics covered:

• Strategic, Operational, and Tactical PSYOP
• White, Gray, and Black psychological operations
• Memetic warfare and social media botnets
• Roswell, Blue Book, and modern disclosure narratives
• Digital influence operations and algorithmic manipulation
• How to recognize a PSYOP in the wild

Episode 50 isn’t about what to believe.

It’s about understanding how belief gets shaped.

Stay curious. Stay awake. Stay weird.

Good series by Sean Ryan on Psy Ops Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNbq79-ttN8&t

Check out our sponsor for the best vegan anti-aging and anti-acne products with a 25% discount for listenters: https://blissani.com/discount/FORTEAN25

Transcript

[music] 
 Welcome to the Fortean Winds podcast where we 
 talk about high stranges and the [music] 
 war for perception. I go by Bones and 
 with us as always is Ram X. 
 >> Hey. Hey everybody. 
 >> Hey Ram. Hey. So this is episode 50 and 
 uh today we're going to do something a 
 little different. We spent years talking 
 about UFOs, mythology, theology, and the 
 fight for disclosure, and digital 
 manipulation, and what we've also called 
 now the war for perception. Uh, so today 
 we're going to kind of strip it down to 
 the fundamentals, and it's going to be 
 what is a SCOP. Um, and we're not 
 talking about the the meme version, uh, 
 not the Hollywood version, the real one, 
 the military doctrine, the operational 
 structure, uh, the mechanics behind how 
 perception gets shaped at scale. Um, 
 because it if perception is the 
 battlefield, then psychological 
 operations are the artillery. And once 
 you understand how they work 
 historically, digitally, and culturally, 
 a lot of things we've covered on this 
 show start looking less mysterious and 
 more strategic. So now we are building 
 the 14 field manual. So let's do it. 
 >> Let's do it. And fortunately for us, 
 there's already a field manual. The 
 military already wrote one, though. We 
 could start there. And I think that 
 that's a great place to start because 
 the public has this perception of 
 everything being a scop and they're both 
 right and wrong because propaganda is a 
 type of a scop. It is more of an effect 
 or a tool within scops and we're going 
 to talk about all of that today and it's 
 kind of special because this is our 50th 
 anniversary episode here. kind of 
 exciting 
 >> and I think we'll just dive right into 
 it as always and we can reminisce about 
 some of the crazy stuff we've talked 
 about. In the uh meantime, we're also 
 going to bring up some current events as 
 examples of some of the things that we 
 talk about as SCOPS. As we mentioned, 
 QAnon is probably the best example of a 
 SCOP we've ever seen. So, I'm sure we'll 
 be using that as a point of comparison. 
 So, let's get into it. A scop is short 
 of course for psychological operation 
 and this is historically also known as a 
 miso. 
 >> Yeah, like miso like you would order in 
 a Japanese restaurant. 
 >> Yeah, love it. 
 >> Which stands for military information 
 support operations. And here I just want 
 to make a point that we're going to talk 
 about information warfare and 
 intelligence interchangeably sometimes. 
 And that is very much true. Information 
 warfare is a type of intelligence 
 operation. And when you think about 
 intelligence in whole, I want us all to 
 remember that intelligence is 
 information. There's aspects of in the 
 intelligence world that are sexy like 
 assassinations or honey traps. 
 >> Exactly. And those things draw a lot of 
 attention and they create a lot of 
 spectacle. But let's remember that 
 information can cause wars. Like there 
 was an incident that's very famous that 
 comes up in psychological operations 
 discussions in Ethiopia where an 
 activist was killed and it sparked a war 
 and the activist's name and address had 
 been posted on Facebook. So once that 
 happened his life was in danger and it 
 brought out like what what is this? 
 >> Yeah. So, it's important to remember 
 that information warfare can kill 
 hundreds of thousands, if not millions 
 of people. Assassinations usually kill 
 one, maybe two. Like, you got to 
 remember the big stuff happens through 
 propaganda, 
 >> right? 
 >> So, it's good that people's eyes are on 
 that. But a miso or SCOP is a planned 
 activity designed to convey selected 
 information to a foreign audience to 
 influence their emotions, motives, 
 reasoning, and ultimately their 
 behavior. Remember, we're talking about 
 the military version of a SCAP. So, this 
 is all designed to be done to a foreign 
 audience. And there is a manual in the 
 public from China right now called 
 unrestricted warfare. and they discuss 
 how do we take on an enemy that is more 
 technologically and militarily powerful 
 and financially superior. How do we do 
 that? And it was clear that they were 
 talking about the US, but they just 
 didn't name any names. 
 >> And this was how it was. You attack from 
 within. And this has been Russian 
 doctrine for a long time. They figured 
 out that if you can't beat them, beat 
 them from within. Lie, cheat, steal, 
 destroy, make them destroy each other. 
 That's the whole idea. 
 >> Fight and conquer. 
 >> And as we're going to get into later, 
 there was an internet research agency in 
 Russia run by some very shady people 
 that was training people from all over 
 the world on how to do this. So that's 
 why we saw things prop up in France. We 
 saw things in Canada that looked very 
 similar to the types of extreme 
 movements, somewhat far right, but also 
 just based on a very weird set of 
 principles that were really all 
 collectively what Russia wanted them to 
 say. And a number of other groups that 
 just wanted to see America and NATO and 
 the West be reduced in power and be able 
 to overcome them strategically. 
 >> Right? We have all been under this 
 attack for more than a decade now. 
 >> Yeah. And we're, you know, we're more 
 intimately uh involved in it now, too, 
 because social media has become the 
 number one tool, it seems. 
 >> In the simplest terms, traditional 
 warfare targets the physical, like 
 tanks, buildings, or soldiers. And a 
 scop targets the mind. So, social media 
 provides the most easy and accessible 
 weapon that's ever existed for bad 
 actors to spread misinformation and 
 disinformation with intent, which is 
 what the core objective of a SCOP is. 
 So, the goal of a SCOP is rarely just to 
 lie. Lying is a part of it, but that's 
 not the goal. In fact, military doctrine 
 often emphasizes that truth is the best 
 weapon in a scop because credibility is 
 essential for long-term influence. 
 >> Ah, right. 
 >> So, the objective is to change a 
 target's perception of reality so they 
 act in a way that benefits the operator. 
 We've brought up the work of Richard 
 theme a number of times, real birds in 
 digital cages. Look him up. great expert 
 on information warfare and the example 
 he often uses is in the tobacco 
 industry. So he said, you know, when the 
 tobacco industry was dealing with the 
 fact that science had just figured out 
 that their product was killing everyone, 
 you would think that their instinct 
 would be to push back on the science, 
 but you would be wrong. Their idea was 
 just to cast enough doubt. So they 
 created a bunch of websites, a bunch of 
 blogs that seemed credible, that had 
 sort of loosely credible information 
 that maybe poked holes in the idea that 
 tobacco may be healthy for you or 
 something, any sort of fringe science 
 that they could get, anything. And they 
 collected it all in one place and then 
 they amplified it. The goal wasn't to 
 beat the science because they knew that 
 they were going to lose and their 
 product was killing people. The goal was 
 just to make people question whether the 
 science was true. 
 >> Right? 
 >> And that is a scop. That is a business 
 that did a scop. 
 The common goals of a scop are usually 
 demoralization. You know, you want to 
 convince your enemy soldiers or 
 populists that their cause is lost or 
 their leaders are corrupt. And they want 
 to encourage desertion and surrender. 
 They they want to take away your 
 willingness to fight. 
 >> Right? And at the same time they want to 
 build support for a different 
 legitimization effort like they want to 
 they want to build support for a 
 specific government or military presence 
 among the local civilian population. So 
 if they recognize that this particular 
 agency was friendly to their cause or 
 they had people in that agency that they 
 owned then they would go okay these are 
 the people that you really want to 
 listen to and everyone else is fake 
 news. Right. Right. 
 >> And then there is deterrence. So they 
 want to overstate a force's capability 
 to resolve or prevent an adversary from 
 attacking. So they want to make it sound 
 like these guys are impossible to beat. 
 You know, here an a good example I would 
 say is the SS from World War II. They 
 had this terrible reputation throughout 
 Germany of being fierce soldiers and 
 warriors and they still do today. But 
 talk to military experts and they'll 
 tell you the SS didn't really win any 
 big military victories. They had some 
 small ones, but the major military 
 German victories were all won by the 
 wear, the regular German army, not the 
 SS. So it was all propaganda. And you 
 know, we can look at the Nazis as being 
 the godfathers of modern propaganda. And 
 then there's disruption. And this one 
 really big in the Russian doctrine and 
 it's really big all over the west today 
 which is to create confusion or friction 
 within an enemy's command structure. 
 Create confusion and friction. I mean 
 this is what Russian military and 
 information warfare is all about. 
 Destabilize the truth. Destabilize the 
 truth. That is the one goal. And you can 
 use other truths to destabilize the 
 truth. And those are often the most 
 effective tools. Now let's get into the 
 three levels of a SCIA. There is the 
 strategic level. And this scale could be 
 on a national level. It could be on a 
 global level. And a good example could 
 be long-term social media campaigns that 
 shape a country's public opinion. Like 
 in the US, this has been going on for a 
 long time. People have been trying to 
 shape our public opinion of foreign 
 actors like Israel, Russia, China, 
 whomever. Like they are pushing us 
 constantly to view Taiwan in a certain 
 way, view Gaza in a certain way, view 
 the Ukraine in a certain way, 
 >> right? 
 >> That is aligned with what they want. And 
 what's amazing about this, and you and I 
 were talking about this right before the 
 podcast, is like why why doesn't 
 anything get done on this? It's because 
 they're kicking us right in our free 
 speech, 
 >> right? 
 >> Every time they spread propaganda, we 
 can see it. You could have intel go, 
 "Hey, this is Russian propaganda. Stop 
 spreading it." And people go, "Why are 
 you trying to stop me from saying what I 
 want to say?" 
 >> Right. Right. So, they're using our free 
 speech against us. 
 >> Yes. And how do you win? You're wrong 
 either way. Either you're limiting our 
 freedom, which makes you look like the 
 bad guy, and now you're proving their 
 point that you are the bad guy, 
 >> right? 
 >> Or you're letting it run and it just 
 keeps getting worse. And this is what 
 happened with QAnon, 
 >> right? 
 >> So the first level is strategic. The 
 second level of a SCOP is operational. 
 And here the scale is more regional. You 
 can call it a theater. That's what it 
 often gets called in military terms or 
 intelligence terms. This is the theater. 
 And that could be a region in a specific 
 country. It could be an entire country. 
 It could be multiple countries. But 
 that's where your operations are 
 happening. And here you'd be delivering 
 digital messages that support a specific 
 province or support a specific regional 
 military campaign or you'd be 
 distributing leaflets if they didn't 
 have internet services or broadcasting 
 it even through a loudspeaker. 
 >> Right? 
 And that gets into the tactical part of 
 it, which is more immediate and local. 
 Obviously, a loudspeaker is very local. 
 So, using a loudspeaker on a battlefield 
 to tell a specific unit how to surrender 
 safely is a SCOP, but it's one that's 
 very directed and very local, which 
 gives us a really good example. Imagine 
 social media doing that to you, 
 >> telling you how to surrender every day, 
 right? 
 And that's going to get us into the 
 color of information. Scop professionals 
 categorize their products or messages 
 based on how transparent they are about 
 the source. So a white SCOP is overt and 
 acknowledged. And the source could be 
 the US government. It's clearly stated. 
 It is usually factual and it's meant to 
 build trust. And as an example of a 
 white scop, we could use Pam Bondi 
 screaming in front of the Congress and 
 the world randomly about the stock 
 market and the Super Bowl and anything 
 but what she was asked. 
 >> Right. Right. Deflection. 
 >> Deflection. So, if someone's listening 
 to this in the future, I'm referring to 
 the attorney general who went up there 
 and was asked about the Epstein files 
 and proceeded to deflect in weird, wild, 
 bimboic ways. 
 >> Yeah, it was not a good look. 
 >> So, then we have the gray scop. The 
 source is ambiguous. It isn't officially 
 acknowledged, but it isn't necessarily a 
 lie. It's designed to look like in 
 independent information. And here we 
 could use an example, an influencer that 
 is taking money from a foreign actor in 
 order to say things that are not 
 necessarily a lie, but they are counter 
 to the truth. And here people go, "What 
 what do you mean by that?" Well, you 
 you'll see. 
 >> Yeah. 
 >> And then the third category of color of 
 information is a black sigh. And this is 
 deceptive. It's a message that is 
 attributed to a source other than the 
 real one. And the best example of this 
 is a false flag. And I'll use a famous 
 historical example of a false flag. The 
 Reich stag fire in World War II where 
 Hitler, 
 >> right, 
 >> they did it. I mean, everyone's like, 
 the Nazis maybe started the fire. No, 
 they started the fire. Like the Nazis 
 started the fire and then they blamed it 
 on the Jews and then they said, this is 
 the reason why we basically have to 
 declare martial law. And this is 
 essentially what Trump was trying to do 
 in Minneapolis. 
 I heard from multiple sources that Trump 
 specifically and the administration 
 specifically chose Minneapolis because 
 they were already organized due to the 
 George Floyd protests. 
 >> Ah okay. 
 >> And they thought that they were going to 
 get the type of response that was going 
 to allow them to declare martial law and 
 take control of elections and do all the 
 other stuff. He wanted that to be his 
 Reich stag fire. So creating chaa chaos 
 is a is a scop technique. 
 >> Creating chaos and confusion is the 
 heartus of Russian 
 >> scop doctrine. 
 >> It is everything. 
 >> Look at their military. Look at their 
 military against Ukraine. A very small 
 country. That's not the threat and they 
 know it. So, if their military isn't the 
 threat, and yes, they're willing to do 
 assassinations, but have you ever seen 
 the guy that were the Russian assassins 
 in u some of these cases? 
 >> No, 
 >> they look like the guy that runs your 
 local liquor store. They do not look 
 like James Bond. So, 
 >> right. Right. 
 >> These guys are the lowest of the 
 lowlevel chuds and they go around 
 spreading poison and things like that. 
 It's not a big beautiful expensive 
 intelligence operation the way you would 
 see in the movies, 
 >> right? 
 >> That's not a part of Russian 
 intelligence doctrine. What is is 
 spreading chaos and confusion. That is 
 the entire heart of it. They're like, 
 "This is the only way we will win. Our 
 military is down. Our economy is low. 
 This is the only way we can win is we 
 are controlled by this propaganda. we 
 can make everyone else controlled by the 
 same propaganda. It's their only weapon 
 on this scale, 
 >> right? 
 >> And for those who doubt that, just so we 
 can kind of keep plowing through. Sean 
 Ryan actually did a pretty good 
 documentary on what is a SCOP recently 
 and they really focused on that. They 
 focused on the Internet Research Agency 
 and the origins of that. So, I'm going 
 to link to that documentary and I invite 
 you to check it out because Sean Ryan is 
 basically a MAGA podcaster. He's a right 
 guy, you know, I mean, he he has 
 supported some of these propaganda ideas 
 previously, so now he's calling it out. 
 And I think that that shows 
 accountability. And it also shows you 
 the depth of a scop. Sean Ryan is a 
 former Navy Seal. He fell for some of 
 this. Like, it's got into the veteran 
 community. It's gotten into my friends. 
 It's been very disturbing to see it. So 
 we talk about I know military scops but 
 we're also kind of also discussing how 
 governments can use scops to basically 
 control their populations right 
 >> yes and here again Russia is the best 
 example because 
 >> there was a guy named Sarov right and he 
 was Putin's propaganda minister all the 
 way until 2020 and he sort of laid the 
 foundation of a lot of this and his 
 whole thing was chaos and confusion to 
 stabilize the truth truth because within 
 that you can start to create a new 
 truth. And yes, Trump tried to do this. 
 Whether it was instinctively or whether 
 it was strategic and planned is up to 
 you. But he went out and he said, "This 
 is all fake news and whatever I'm 
 telling you is the truth." That is 
 exactly what Putin did and it worked, 
 but you have to shut down the other news 
 sources. And one of the things that 
 Sarov did, which was evil but genius, is 
 that they went and they funded a bunch 
 of far-right and far-left groups that 
 were counter to Putin. 
 >> And then they told everybody. So now all 
 your champions, look at all your 
 champions, they all work for us. 
 >> Ah, right. Right. It's very common. It's 
 often um overused is the is the quote of 
 flooding the zone, right? And that's 
 kind of the same model, the Russian 
 model of chaos where nobody really knows 
 what the truth is anymore. Um, and you 
 you look at the other side, you know, 
 China is kind of the opposite where they 
 have a very closed propaganda system 
 where they just want to completely um 
 isolate their population from 
 information sources. Yeah, China's is 
 more based on information control, but 
 it's not quite as controlled as we would 
 think in the west. They do have some 
 free media. We have quite a bit of 
 Chinese [sighs and gasps] 
 >> traffic uh to 4TN wins and it's actually 
 real traffic. It's not just bots. 
 >> H it would be questionable. I would 
 question who who has more information 
 freedom between China and Russia. And 
 you could even throw us in that mix. Now 
 I we're you could question how much 
 information freedom we have because in 
 the 21st century SCP has moved from 
 paper leaflets and radio towers to the 
 internet, 
 >> right? 
 >> And the internet is controlled by our 
 algorithms. 
 Elon Musk is a good example. So he likes 
 this post of this guy who is a far-right 
 ideologue who said someone needs to buy 
 X and if we buy X we can start 
 controlling people's minds and 
 perception this way. He likes this post 
 years ago and then he buys X. 
 >> He clearly understood the value of 
 utilizing X in order to manipulate 
 perception and then he got up and 
 bragged about the fact that he did that 
 in the the 2024 election. right? 
 >> Daring everyone to prove it. And people 
 think that they have and you know what's 
 going to happen there. We'll see. But he 
 he understood the value of this. And you 
 can question the legality or illegality 
 of it. It it's like the Epstein files. 
 Like look, it's all illegal. That's 
 that's not the question. We just keep 
 resurfacing the information because 
 awareness is the only counter to this 
 when the law fails. and then enough of 
 us have to get mad enough to enforce the 
 law. That's the only thing that we can 
 do to counter all this. We we received a 
 comment one time. It was like more 
 conspiritainment shows. Why do all these 
 shows talk about the same thing? And I 
 could tell that it was someone who was 
 just mad about our point of view on 
 something. And I didn't respond. Of 
 course, people are entitled to their 
 opinions. But at the same time, my 
 thought was the reason all of these 
 shows talk about the same thing, if 
 they're being honest, is because these 
 things are real. The Epstein files are 
 real and they're not getting covered by 
 the mainstream media. So, we have to 
 talk about them. And conspiracies are 
 just groups of people doing bad things. 
 That exists, 
 >> right? But the goal of someone trying to 
 call something a conspiracy theory is to 
 trivialize it. It's to make it sound 
 like fiction. Right. And 
 >> Right. 
 >> You call scops conspiracies. 
 Some people would because they don't 
 want to accept the fact that they are 
 hooked in to a dopamine feed from a 
 scop. 
 >> Yeah. Sad but true. These social media 
 botn nets are using automated accounts 
 in many cases to trend certain hashtags 
 or amplify certain narratives. And then 
 you have the foreign actors. And what 
 was really interesting recently was when 
 X to their credit started a new feature 
 in which they would show you which 
 country an account originated, 
 >> right? 
 And when they did so, you found a bunch 
 of these MAGA accounts that were coming 
 from other countries and all over the 
 place. Nigeria, South Africa, 
 >> and some of those Yeah. India, a lot 
 from India. 
 >> Some of those were bad actors. Most of 
 them, what I found so fascinating were 
 just doing it for money. 
 >> They realized that clicks equal money. 
 And they realized that these things that 
 the internet research agency or some 
 sort of bad actor had figured out were 
 highclick posts, they were just going to 
 take those and use those to build 
 accounts and make money. 
 >> Sure. 
 >> So now they were just destroying our 
 country for for cash. 
 >> For cash. [laughter] 
 I mean if you look Yeah. I mean that's 
 what it is. The algorithms that are 
 being fed to to us are to make sure that 
 we stick with that algorithm all day 
 long and watch it. 
 >> Yeah, it's not a good source. You have 
 to follow individuals. I think 
 everyone's been like, "Well, what's the 
 solution? What can we trust?" You have 
 to follow individuals. 
 >> Find people that you trust. Find people 
 that are giving you good information and 
 follow those individuals. And I would 
 include journalists in that. I follow 
 individual journalists and when I'm 
 looking for more information, that's who 
 I go to. I used to trust the AP's front 
 page, but now it's been contaminated, 
 too. I They're all full of headline 
 manipulation as well. I I don't know 
 exactly why that happened, and I don't 
 care. Like, I just don't do that 
 anymore. I don't use the AP as my scan 
 unit. There's a place called Ground News 
 that's pretty good that they tell you 
 what each place's bias is. Those news 
 fact checkers, th those are good. You 
 know that they're all generally doing it 
 the same way. They're like, "What is 
 your bias? Are you right or left? 
 >> How much of that is getting involved in 
 the narrative?" And, you know, AI's 
 gotten pretty good to the point where it 
 can sus a lot of that out. So those are 
 options. But then I would say mostly 
 just follow individuals, follow people 
 that you can trust. 
 >> When you really start looking into this 
 stuff, you realize that marketing is a 
 scop, right? I mean, I always think of 
 the stories of the communist countries 
 that always had a a a personal dossier 
 on every citizen. So if if there was any 
 suspicious activity or behavior um 
 reported on you, it would always be in 
 this um file. 
 >> And I always thought, you know, our 
 version of that was basically marketing 
 profiles where where they would take our 
 purchasing. 
 >> Yes. Personas. 
 >> Yeah, that's what we call them. And it's 
 exact same. It is the exact same. And my 
 knowledge of this subject has been 
 helped exponentially by the fact that I 
 do the same thing but for money, 
 >> right? 
 >> Follow the law and I try to do so as 
 ethically as possible unlike these guys. 
 But that's also why my BS detector is so 
 high for all of it. I'm like, I I 
 understand what you're doing. I 
 understand exactly the process that 
 you're using to test this stuff in. And 
 the way that they're doing it and what 
 their goals are, as I've mentioned, are 
 so much easier than what we want. 
 >> They just want a click. That's super 
 easy to get. All you need to do is put a 
 sensational headline up there. And now 
 you know that that person is interested 
 in whatever it is that you put the 
 headline up. So, if it was something 
 that was racist, now you know that 
 person's a racist. If it was something 
 that was anti-racist, now you know that 
 person's an anti-racist. And those are 
 especially the groups that these Russian 
 types are looking for. They're looking 
 for opposing groups. And then they 
 amplify both groups messages. They were 
 amplifying BLM and they were amplifying 
 the racist stuff. They were they were 
 trying to make it as big and as 
 controversial and as divisive as 
 possible because they just want to see 
 us murdering each other in the streets. 
 >> You think you chose the headline? 
 That's a scop, 
 >> right? 
 >> And what makes us so vulnerable is our 
 laws, is our constitution. Because under 
 US law and military doctrine, SCOPs are 
 supposed to be strictly prohibited from 
 targeting US citizens. But if you're 
 like a Michael Flynn and we taught you 
 how to do scops for 20 years and then 
 you want to go do it for some 
 billionaires, right? 
 >> And you know, nothing stopping you, 
 >> right? I always think of, you know, 
 historically think of um how Nixon's FBI 
 infiltrated the students for a 
 democratic society back in the 60s. I 
 mean, that's that's a classic case of of 
 internal scops. 
 >> Absolutely. They've done it a number of 
 times with UFOs and they're not supposed 
 to. It's against the law. 
 >> The very famous incident of Richard 
 Dodie who comes up a lot, still around 
 in Euphology, and he was an Air Force 
 officer that was telling Paul Benowitz, 
 who eventually committed suicide. You 
 can, you're probably familiar with this 
 story already, but there's a million UFO 
 shows about it. and Dodie was feeding 
 Benowitz information that was 
 misinformation about UFOs and Benowitz 
 ended up committing suicide. So the 
 government in that case was actively 
 getting involved. Dodie doesn't deny 
 that he was working for the Air Force 
 and given orders to misinform. 
 So that is against the law. We know that 
 they were doing that for UFOs. 
 >> And then in the age of the internet, 
 there's the spillover effect. 
 where an operation that was meant for a 
 foreign audience is seen and believed by 
 people here, 
 >> right? 
 >> They spread lies about something that 
 happened in another country and then 
 people see it here and start repeating 
 it. And this remains a huge ethical and 
 political challenge even in the best of 
 times. But right now they've thrown 
 ethics and the law out the window. So, 
 you know, we all have to be extra 
 careful, 
 >> right? 
 >> But the big takeaway I want you to have 
 from this part is that the term SCOP is 
 often used colloquially online to 
 describe anything that feels like 
 conspiracy or social engineering. But in 
 a formal [music] sense, it refers 
 specifically to the planned professional 
 application of psychology by a [music] 
 government or military entity. 
 >> Right? And we all know that, you know, 
 there's we have bad actors within our 
 country that [music] are willing to 
 basically spread disinformation for 
 billionaires. [music] 
 >> Yeah. And they're coming right out of 
 SCOPS like we said that Michael Flynn, 
 [music] great example. 
 >> Yeah. 
 >> And they're using the same tactics. 
 [music] So what are those tactics? 
 First, they have to define the target 
 audience. And this is exactly what we do 
 in business. [music] We define our 
 target audience. Okay, we're going to 
 sell a new pool cleaner. We know that 
 that group has got to be wealthy. 
 They're going to be homeowners. [music] 
 They're going to be more likely to play 
 golf. That, you know, a bunch of 
 different things. We can create 
 different personas. I'm Jack. I I own a 
 pool and this is who I am. I'm Stacy. I 
 own a pool. This is who I am. And then 
 you just go look for Jacks and Stacy's. 
 They do the same thing, right? Operators 
 do not send messages blindly. They use a 
 specific methodology to [music] identify 
 psychological vulnerabilities. 
 Vulnerabilities are not weaknesses. 
 Vulnerabilities are I [music] need, I 
 want, I desire. And this is how this is 
 what makes you vulnerable. What you 
 need, what you want, what you desire. 
 And then there's what makes you 
 susceptible. So first is vulnerability. 
 Second is susceptibility. And 
 susceptibility is the [music] degree to 
 which a target audience can be 
 influenced by a specific message. Going 
 back to our pool guy, if you're like, I 
 own a pool, you're in the target 
 audience. But if you're like, I am 
 searching for a new pool cleaner, you're 
 very susceptible [music] to our message. 
 Right. 
 >> Right. 
 >> And then there's accessibility, which 
 means that the [music] physical and 
 digital channels that the target is 
 using are accessible to [music] you. So, 
 if you know that that person's always on 
 Facebook, now I'm hitting that person 
 over and over again with pool [music] 
 ads on Facebook, right? Pool cleaning 
 ads. 
 >> Right now, let's do that with your uncle 
 Joe. Your uncle Joe's been out of work 
 for a year. He's a roofer. [music] He 
 needs and wants a job. He desires to be 
 looked at as something more than just 
 [music] an out of work roofer. and he 
 clicks on something that says become a 
 digital warrior for Q. They might look 
 at his persona and a machine would do 
 all this, not necessarily a person, and 
 it would say, okay, Joe is very 
 susceptible because he [music] has been 
 clicking on all of this other ancillary 
 Q related material and some of it 
 required an email address and Joe has 
 submitted his email address. Now Joe is 
 super accessible. You can find Joe on 
 all the physical and digital channels 
 that he uses, radio, Telegram, WhatsApp, 
 whatever. Now you have a direct pipeline 
 to induce or reinforce foreign attitudes 
 and behaviors favorable to the target's 
 objective. And here we could say foreign 
 would be anything that's foreign to the 
 person because I think we've now 
 transcended the idea that SCOPS are only 
 done globally. But what makes this so 
 complicated and that we have to layer 
 all this in is that those global scops 
 are happening. And then there's people 
 within the US that are taking advantage 
 of those different scops like say Steve 
 Bannon who sees some of the Russian 
 propaganda as being aligned with his 
 own. So he starts amplifying the same 
 message and certain influencers pick up 
 on that. So then they just kind of form 
 their own web of disinformation and 
 misinformation and there's no foreign or 
 domestic boundary in there. So 
 >> right, 
 >> it's just a narrative that's being 
 pushed with an agenda and that is the 
 SCOP and you lose the forest for the 
 trees, right? When this all happens, 
 >> you have to go wait. All they're trying 
 to do is destroy the environment. Like 
 it doesn't really matter. You you got to 
 just shut out the noise, right? Separate 
 the signal from the noise, 
 >> right? 
 >> Now, the army has a sevenstep scop 
 process. It involves planning, which is 
 integrating the SCOP into the larger 
 military or political goal, and then 
 it's target audience analysis, and then 
 it's series development, which means 
 creating a sequence of messages, not 
 just a one-off that builds a narrative. 
 And this is exactly what is done in 
 business. If you signed up for some 
 emails from a company, the first one 
 says, "Hey, welcome. This is what our 
 products are all about." Like if you 
 signed up for emails to this fantastic 
 vegan skincare company, Blissani at 
 blissani.com, you would get a welcome 
 that says, "Hey, welcome to Blissani. 
 Enjoy our fantastic vegan skin care 
 products like Very Tony or Gemma Crema, 
 which are both wonderful for wrinkles 
 and and anti-aging. 
 This is a scop by the way. I I'm 
 slipping an ad [laughter] in here. So I 
 but I want to be transparent with you. 
 So 
 and if I said in the next one you can 
 get 25% off with code 1425 
 that would be the next message in the 
 sequence, right? And then the third one 
 >> after me. [laughter] 
 >> The third one is 14 wins gets a portion 
 of every order. There's emotion in that. 
 Right. There's connection in that. 
 >> Right. Right. Right. So it it is it 
 really is like but I want to be 
 transparent about that. I think we've 
 always been like because I know I know 
 what it all is and we refuse to do any 
 of that on the show and promote like 
 that like so it feels really good for me 
 to not do it here and and be 
 transparent. But that's what series 
 development is. It's developing a 
 sequence of messages and business is the 
 best example of that. 
 >> Right? But this is how radicalization 
 works in a lot of different ways. They 
 start with, "Oh, okay. Well, this is why 
 you should hate the Jews." And then the 
 next thing you know, it's like, "Oh, 
 well, come to our Nazi meeting and join 
 our fight club. Oh, hey, bomb a power 
 station." You know, it just escalates 
 and escalates. And they they have a a 
 sequence that they use on people who can 
 potentially be radicalized to that level 
 and create violence. That's a whole 
 other thing they call the iceberg theory 
 and we'll get into that another time. 
 But the next step after serious 
 development is product design which is 
 crafting the actual media. So they have 
 to create memes, they have to create 
 headlines and then they test those in. 
 This is where I wanted to really focus 
 on what 4chan was for QAnon. It was a 
 sandbox and that is so essential. You 
 cannot make any of these campaigns work 
 unless you can test and get data. And 
 then once you do, it becomes like a 
 video game, man. It is not that hard. 
 You start going, "This one's bigger than 
 this one." And then in a traditional 
 SCOP, you would go get approval. And 
 here, what's important is that that 
 means someone's in charge. In a military 
 operation, obviously, that's your higher 
 command, which would go all the way up 
 to the president. And in these public 
 operations, that's the question you 
 should be asking. Look to see who will 
 benefit, who benefits from this message, 
 who benefits from this narrative, from 
 this headline. If it's disinformation, 
 sometimes there's stuff that comes out 
 that benefits one party or the other, 
 and it's true. Just get over it. Deal 
 with it. Stop trying to counter it. Your 
 party is not perfect. Neither one is. 
 And it's the partisan divide that they 
 keep pushing on. Another fun little AI 
 exercise you can do. I know last time I 
 said, you know, put all these events 
 from the Epstein files in and ask Gemini 
 or whatever whether or not these are 
 coincidental. Ask it to run some actual 
 statistics and then ask it to counter 
 that narrative and ask it to do so with 
 data. You'll see that these things are 
 very deliberate, 
 >> right? 
 do that with the fact that the US has 
 been basically 5050 for decades in 
 between the partisans. 
 >> Yeah. I mean, you can even say that uh 
 information is used as a shield in a way 
 instead of just throwing up uh 
 disinformation at a certain um group of 
 people. You just have basically a wall 
 of different disinformation that shields 
 people away from the truth. 
 >> Yeah. You contain it. That's the 
 official term. Yes. Yeah. Right. Right. 
 >> Once you get approval for the message, 
 you have to produce and distribute the 
 message. So that's another aspect to a 
 psychological operation. It's like who's 
 going to do that and how. I've mentioned 
 a number of times that anyone can go 
 into the National Archives and look at 
 all the Russian ad buys that they 
 collected from back in 2016 when they 
 were trying to manipulate. Look at what 
 they were trying to manipulate. Look at 
 what they were trying to say. That 
 that's important. and they were trying 
 to push on the partisan divide, 
 especially the extremes of the partisan 
 divide. And this worked for them back in 
 Russia. And we talked about the final 
 step in the psychological operation 
 process, which is evaluation. So you 
 have to see how well and effective it 
 was. You make tweaks just like we would 
 to a digital marketing campaign and send 
 it back out, 
 >> right? Yeah. I mean the biggest problem 
 with with all that kind of uh you know 
 personal data collection that we we keep 
 talking about is that there are judgment 
 calls that are that are made using this 
 information. So you have a, you know, a 
 behavior profile too, not and a consumer 
 profile. And there are agencies that 
 been around for a long time before 
 social media that that actually tried to 
 create a consumer profile on you to see 
 if you were you would be the ideal 
 employee for companies. 
 >> Yes. And right now all these privacy 
 standards are getting clobbered. 
 >> Palunteer is coming in and saying we can 
 look at whatever we want. the government 
 is removing all of these privacy 
 regulations and it was always the 
 Republicans who were supposed to be 
 sticking up for that. 
 >> Right. Right. But it's becoming more 
 predictive too, right? I mean the the 
 new goal really is not just to get this 
 consumer profile on you but but to 
 predict your next move. 
 >> That is the goal. 
 >> And with 
 >> Yes. 
 >> And with with AI it's becoming a lot 
 more efficient this prediction. 
 >> Yes. We can already do this in business. 
 So, Google will do this for us. You can 
 launch an ad within Google that will 
 basically go out and look for markers 
 and Google knows so much about you 
 because there are so many different 
 markers based on what you look at and 
 you click on and they've been collecting 
 so much data on you and they know how 
 much money you make and what you're 
 interested in and it's pretty freaking 
 advanced. It can go out and predict 
 whether or not you're a likely shopper 
 or not. You could remove all of the 
 shopping stuff. You could input a bunch 
 of stuff that's social and political and 
 you can start targeting anyone you want 
 with whatever message you want or 
 throwing anyone in jail you want. 
 >> Yeah. I mean, you could very easily say, 
 um, you know, give me the group of 
 people who are most likely to disrupt a 
 federal operation or who who is more 
 likely to be an activist. 
 >> Yeah. So there's one more term here that 
 they can use to identify psychological 
 operations and information warfare and 
 intelligence warfare, but each one of 
 those terms is important. They're all 
 referencing the same thing. Propaganda, 
 too. And we should accept that all of 
 those terms mean the same thing. And 
 we'll introduce one more here. It's 
 called cognitive warfare because this is 
 a war for your perception. But that is 
 what they call it. We're calling it war 
 for your perception. And as we move into 
 2026, that's what the term has evolved 
 into. 
 >> It's the weaponization of brain science. 
 And like I mentioned in that cicada 3301 
 stuff, which was an alternate reality 
 game that preceded Q, that was an awful 
 lot like Q. That appears to be one form 
 of experimentation that led to Q. They 
 were calling this type of human 
 programming feing. F E E C T I N G if 
 you want to look that up. And this 
 cognitive warfare involves 
 microtargeting or using leaked or 
 purchased data to send different 
 psychological messages to individual 
 people based on their specific 
 personality traits. And this is the 
 Cambridge Analytical model. Cambridge 
 Analytica was a company that famously 
 was collecting a bunch of data from 
 Facebook that they weren't supposed to 
 collect and using it to target people 
 with exactly these messages. 
 >> Yeah, 
 >> that was a SCOP. That was a tool within 
 a scop. That was propaganda. And they 
 were especially going after Facebook 
 groups because once they realized that 
 the ads would only take them so far and 
 they didn't have the credibility. The 
 other part of Russian intelligence 
 doctrine is to go after influencers, go 
 after groups, go after priests, 
 especially clergy. They were targeting 
 pastors with pro-Russian 
 pro- farright whatever this Putin 
 cronyism oligarchic nightmare nihilism 
 stupidity that this represents. They 
 were targeting pastors with it and they 
 were trying to craft different religious 
 messages which we've talked a lot about. 
 And this involves reflexive control. 
 This is a Russian military theory where 
 you feed an adversary specific 
 information so that they voluntarily 
 make a decision that is actually to your 
 advantage. Like we've talked about 
 assets and agent. An asset is out there 
 just doing the thing for you. You're 
 pushing behind the asset. An agent is 
 the one who knows that they're involved 
 in an intelligence operation is actively 
 pushing the disinformation or 
 misinformation. So here we could say 
 influencer on the take, audience of the 
 influencer on the take. Influencer on 
 the take is the agent. Audience of the 
 influencer on the take are the assets or 
 the other term that gets often used here 
 is useful idiot. 
 >> Right? 
 >> And what they're aiming for here is 
 information overload. And this is a 
 defensive scop tactic where you flood 
 the zone with so much noise and 
 conflicting data that the target 
 audience gives up on trying to find the 
 truth. And this leads to apathy. 
 It also leads to people creating their 
 own truths which further fragments the 
 truth. And that's why people in the 
 QAnon community were encouraged to do 
 that. 
 >> Yeah. 
 >> First we want to confuse you. Now we 
 want you all creating your own truth. 
 Now there's no way to get to the truth. 
 There's so many different fragmentations 
 of the original source. It's impossible 
 to find the original. 
 >> So John Keel always talked about UFOs as 
 [music] being a giant scop. I mean, how 
 do we use that to understand [music] 
 basically what we know about in the 
 public record about UFOs, 
 >> right? What did Keel mean by that? And 
 now that we understand what a SCOP is, 
 [music] how does the UFO phenomenon 
 conform to the structure that we just 
 laid out, 
 >> right? 
 >> Well, let's start with the key goals of 
 a SCOP and see how they relate to 
 eupfology. We stated [music] the first 
 goal was to demoralize the enemy, break 
 their will. And we could argue that the 
 UFO phenomenon [music] does this by 
 appearing in so many different guises. 
 eventually you just give up and 
 appearing in so many different [music] 
 scientific ways like that eventually you 
 just go we'll never understand this so 
 >> right 
 >> let's just move on and then the second 
 key goal [music] that we laid out from a 
 side up is to legitimize 
 allies or regimes or belief systems that 
 align with your [music] goals and here 
 we could say that this is possibly what 
 they are doing with the [music] 
 extraterrestrial narrative that they are 
 attempting to legitimize that narrative 
 or [music] the fairy narrative or the 
 jin narrative in order to deflect 
 [music] from what they really are. 
 >> H yeah. 
 >> And then there's deterrence, which is 
 when you're trying to overstate your 
 force, [music] remember, or trying to 
 make people feel like opposition is 
 impossible. And they've certainly done 
 that with us, right? [music] They've 
 made us feel like we can't fight back, 
 that they can walk through walls, go 
 [music] thousands of miles, they can 
 appear anywhere. Like, what are we 
 doing? And I do think [music] that that 
 is a bluff. I do think that they're 
 afraid of us on some level and we 
 [music] just have to figure out why, 
 right? 
 >> And then there's disruption. That's the 
 fourth goal of ASIP. They most certainly 
 have disrupted us so many times and 
 [music] in so many different ways and in 
 many different ways that we're not quite 
 sure whether or not they did. Like we 
 talk about the book of Enoch. Let's 
 [music] go all the way back there and 
 that sounds a lot like a invasive 
 species introducing technology to a 
 species [music] that wasn't ready for 
 it. They talk in the book of Enoch about 
 the Nephilim introducing cosmetics and 
 introducing [music] metallurgy which is 
 basically like saying they introduce the 
 concept of deception and war. 
 >> So if that is a phenomenon related story 
 and maybe it is maybe it isn't it's a 
 good allegory to what they do. They 
 introduce chaos and disruption every 
 time they appear in someone's life and 
 that sends that person on a completely 
 different track. 
 >> And then what do you have? You have you 
 have two parties. You have the people 
 who say it's all fake and you have the 
 people who say it's all real and you 
 don't have anyone in the middle thinking 
 critically about it. 
 >> Exactly. And now they serve the big goal 
 of the Russian SCOP program, right? Like 
 they 
 fragmented the truth in so many 
 different ways that you can't see the 
 forest for the trees. 
 >> Yeah, 
 >> you could almost argue that they're 
 different guises are meimedic. They're 
 they're almost like different memes. I 
 think that that's actually a great way 
 to look at them. 
 >> Yeah. Yeah. 
 >> And memes have power in this world of 
 information warfare and perception. 
 >> Yeah. I I see the term meme warfare, you 
 know, it's just it's a real thing. I 
 makes me shake my head, but it's a real 
 thing. Kitty pitchers can uh can destroy 
 countries 
 as well. They should. Let's get to it. 
 America, you've been psyched. You know, 
 the Epstein files are horrible, but they 
 present us with a huge opportunity 
 to not only provide some long overdue 
 justice to some victims and survivors 
 who have been denied justice for far too 
 long. We have the opportunity 
 to in one fell swoop 
 clear out this deep state, deep swamp 
 that everyone was talking about. 
 >> Yeah. Those Epstein files are like a 
 Rosetta Stone to every conspiracy that 
 everyone 
 has ever even postulated on 4chan. 
 Putin was funding Marine Le Pen in 
 France. That's right in line with what 
 we're talking about. All of that came 
 out in the Epstein files. 
 >> Yep. 
 >> Now you know who. And it wasn't just 
 Putin. There was definitely MSAD 
 involved, right? And there was 
 definitely the CIA involved. 
 >> Yeah. And a lot of money. 
 >> And China, too. They're pretty sneaky 
 about this. Iran got involved in the 
 foreign action as well. But you could 
 just chalk that up to saying foreign 
 actors that want to destroy the United 
 States. And there is about a list of, I 
 don't know, at least eight countries 
 that you could add to that list that are 
 actively pursuing SCOPS on the US at all 
 times. 
 >> Right. Right. 
 And then you add to that 
 the internal dipads 
 who want to control the world. And then 
 you add to that the ultraterrestrials 
 that want to control the controllers. 
 >> And you know, hey, what about me? What 
 about me and Bones? You're 
 >> right. [laughter] 
 All I can say is, hey everyone, don't be 
 a useful idiot. [laughter] 
 So the theme of today is hey don't be a 
 useful idiot after 50 episodes 
 [laughter and gasps] uh you know 
 covering so many topics from uh you know 
 from the UFOs to disclosure to the 
 Epstein files and QAnon 
 you know I think we've covered a lot. 
 >> Yeah. What a crazy ride this has been. 
 We've quit at least twice and we're 
 still here. [laughter] 
 >> Right. 
 >> Right. 
 I was talking to one of our silent 
 partners who works on a lot of the 
 videos who actually did a little song 
 for us for our 50th episode. He did use 
 AI to help, but he used your music and 
 all of our research in order to create 
 the song. We thought it was pretty cool. 
 So, we're going to close the show. But, 
 uh, 
 >> he always refers to us as Bad Shrimp. 
 He's like, you know, you listen to the 
 show, you're like, "Hey, that was pretty 
 good." And then like a day later starts 
 to hit you. [laughter] 
 >> Like 
 >> I see. 
 >> I feel like 
 >> we don't leave we don't leave a bad 
 taste in anyone's mouth. We just uh 
 we're we're planting some seeds. 
 >> We're unsettling. I think was the point. 
 >> Okay. Okay. 
 >> We're subtly unsettling. Like you think 
 you think it was just a show and then 
 you go, 
 >> "Oh gosh." Uh you know, a day later. And 
 if we're hitting that note, that's 
 exactly where I want to be because, you 
 know, some folks we talked about how 
 some folks ask us like, "Why why don't 
 people know more about you?" And some of 
 that is our fault. Like, we definitely 
 desensationalize the hell out of this 
 show because we think all of it gets 
 over sensationalized and then it looks 
 like BS, 
 >> right? 
 >> And we also think the community's just 
 been led around by the nose for far too 
 long. Like, and here's an example of a 
 show that I like that we all like called 
 The Y Files. And I'm sure those of you 
 out there interested in the phenomenon 
 have seen it. And that's like our 
 version of ancient aliens around here. 
 And I like that show cuz in the end, he 
 does talk about Real's research and his 
 point of view on whether whatever the 
 topic was was real or not. And I give 
 him a lot of credit for that. But he 
 tells you a 20 25 minute story about 
 whatever it is before he tells you the 
 truth. And we would never do that here, 
 you know? 
 >> Right. Right. 
 >> It makes for a good show. It makes for a 
 good story, 
 >> but that's not at all what we're about. 
 That's why we bury the lead. And as we 
 were talking with our friend who did the 
 song, he was saying how that's always 
 going to prevent us from being a more 
 commercial show like that that and 
 that's okay. I think what we all decided 
 is this show is going to remain as is 
 and we are working on some videos that 
 will allow us to be a little bit more 
 narrative friendly and still say what we 
 want to say. But this show is always 
 going to be truth straight to your 
 veins. 
 >> Yeah, right on. I mean, we we cover so 
 many topics, too. I mean, it's not just 
 uh high strangers and UFOs. And we talk 
 about theology. We talk about we talk 
 about cultural traditions, you know, we 
 we talk about so many things and uh 
 they're all relevant and they all tie 
 together and I I think what we're doing 
 is good. I think uh we're on the right 
 track. 
 >> Yeah, I really enjoyed that this show 
 has given me an opportunity to learn. I 
 hope that it I've been able to pass on 
 some things that I've learned to you 
 because I think these are things that 
 we're all curious about. 
 I know we say it all the time, but thank 
 you. Thank you for listening. 
 >> Yeah, for sure. Thanks everyone for 
 listening. We can't uh really thank you 
 enough. So, to uh 50 more episodes, 
 Ramx. 
 >> Oh my gosh. Can you imagine? Like, think 
 about where we started in episode 1 and 
 where we got to in episode 50. And yeah, 
 I had some idea of where we were going, 
 but nowhere near where we ended up. And 
 that is fascinating. That is something I 
 hope that people like about the show 
 because to me that's authentic research. 
 You're you're not going to get it right. 
 Like just go in there, stick your head 
 in, start looking around, start trying 
 to make pieces fit, and then eventually 
 the truth will reveal itself. 
 [laughter] 
 >> Cue the music. 
 >> Cue the music. 
 >> Yeah. Right. 
 >> All right, everyone. That's episode 50. 
 Thanks for listening. Uh, make sure to 
 visit our website at 14wins.com. [music] 
 [music] When the damn data meets the 
 power elite blackmail networks in the 
 incomplete 40 and winds parsing what the 
 mainstream won't see government 
 controller just [music] high strangers 
 in the VIP. Let's get dark. 40 and was 
 blowing through the server racks. Files 
 redacted secrets in the zipper pack. 17 
 anomaly compromise [music] the pyramid 
 scheme. Damn data of the island floating 
 in the mainstream. We don't believe we 
 measure what the digits say. From 
 [music] paranormal skies to the black 
 dossier the rules are by the ones who 
 write the law for your database. Got the 
 files you never saw. Started with rains 
 or frogs. Now [music] we tracking 
 private planes. Little James anomalies 
 compromise the range. Ho catalog the 
 damn. We catalog [music] the elite where 
 the UFO files meet the financial deceit. 
 Government controller just another 
 [music] spectral force pattern 
 recognition in the inner pole reports 
 rap by bind the services. Michael 
 [music] guard the cloud 70 generations 
 of the secrets getting loud not saying 
 it's aliens but the systems parasitic 
 [music] high strangers in the network 
 classified cryptic technian 
 methodology connected dispar shapes. 
 terrestrial hypothesis. They're not from 
 the stars. [music] Living in the 
 infrastructure, hiding who they are. 
 Have seen intelligence connection. Eyes 
 wide shut. Compromise the compromise. 
 Kept it in the rut. From skin walker to 
 [music] the Caribbean seas, a hitchhiker 
 effect, a global mystery. Who controls 
 the controllers? Data is the exorcist. 
 Anonymous collected passing [music] the 
 manifest for rejected presidents. We 
 reject the narrative. Mainstream 
 explanation to [music] derivative 
 quantum entanglement of power in a view. 
 40 wins analyzing what the news won't 
 produce. [music] Reality leaves 
 fingerprints on the lolita express 
 pattern analysis of the address list. 
 [music] Not spiritualist just watching 
 the power [singing] curve. High stranges 
 in the system that the people deserve to 
 know. Damn data of the [music] elite 
 design. When the paranormal meets the 
 corporate crime, Epstein didn't kill 
 himself. That's the baseline strange 40 
 and database tracking what the agencies 
 arrange. [music] Now we need to federal 
 black sites compromising and the 
 satellite rights government controller 
 [music] just another watch 200 angel 
 taught us how to build a wall between 
 the [music] class and between the known 
 and seal ever seen anomaly never 
 revealed where theologist of the 
 twilight zone separated signal from the 
 marrow of the bone wins [music] was a 
 theory just a fact in the cryptographic 
 contract 70 shepherds guarding The gates 
 were damn it always [music] circulate. 
 [music] Yeah. 
 [music] 
 The wind blows weird around the island. 
 [music] 
 The service stay on 
 it. [music] 
 What a damn day to live forever. Even 
 when they try to bury it blowing 
 >> [music]